tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6155812.post3705893355027869814..comments2023-12-14T20:03:28.867+08:00Comments on 雙語 Incoherent thoughts: 勇氣,去了哪?pakmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12594314166399890483noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6155812.post-50629109304797269532007-06-06T20:16:00.000+08:002007-06-06T20:16:00.000+08:00Will have a new blog entry on this.Let me give it ...Will have a new blog entry on this.<BR/><BR/>Let me give it some thought.pakmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12594314166399890483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6155812.post-30567262626654424052007-06-06T05:06:00.000+08:002007-06-06T05:06:00.000+08:006月4日燭光晚會證明大家對自由仲有希望咁唔該大家迪迪尼、超連結呢類硬膠case定要大大力小下正苦 &...6月4日燭光晚會<BR/>證明大家<BR/>對自由仲有希望<BR/>咁唔該大家<BR/>迪迪尼、超連結呢類硬膠case<BR/>定要大大力小下正苦 & 硬膠警察米生https://www.blogger.com/profile/09868924385014443849noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6155812.post-73370882902464775862007-06-05T08:00:00.000+08:002007-06-05T08:00:00.000+08:00最認同你呢句:”捉賊又唔見你咁叻?”呢單嘢點可以告”浪費警力”?真係要問下法律界人士.裁判官林嘉欣指...最認同你呢句:”捉賊又唔見你咁叻?”<BR/><BR/>呢單嘢點可以告”浪費警力”?真係要問下法律界人士.<BR/><BR/>裁判官林嘉欣指九一一事件後,公眾對「炸彈」、「美國領事館」及「恐怖分子」等字眼較敏感,指被告所為對公眾構成恐慌,就如在人多的戲院內大喊「火燭」,毫無幽默感及開玩笑成份。去年九月十九日警方接獲舉報,在迪士尼樂園內大舉搜查及加強保安,共耗用二百一十三小時警力,涉及公帑三萬二千多元。<BR/><BR/>官方反應過敏啫,佢哋硬膠都入埋當事人數?世上最屈機事件不過如此.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6155812.post-59602930469947652022007-06-05T03:49:00.000+08:002007-06-05T03:49:00.000+08:00I can understand why he plead guilty.I just wish h...I can understand why he plead guilty.<BR/><BR/>I just wish he didn't. I really really did. Hell, if he didn't have any money to fight, I will be the first to seek donation.<BR/><BR/>Shuenpakmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12594314166399890483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6155812.post-47959401018255672962007-06-05T03:48:00.000+08:002007-06-05T03:48:00.000+08:00Dear Branco,I don't know what his fiscal profile l...Dear Branco,<BR/><BR/>I don't know what his fiscal profile looks like. But he should apply for legal aid.<BR/><BR/>Ultimately, the price of barristers is very high. Too high.<BR/><BR/>I am pissed about <A HREF="http://phatdat.blogspot.com/2007/04/blog-post_03.html" REL="nofollow">that </A>too!<BR/><BR/>Anyhow, it is extremely intimidating to face the full power of a vengeful government bent on a pakmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12594314166399890483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6155812.post-9781949342381980212007-06-04T23:46:00.000+08:002007-06-04T23:46:00.000+08:00PacManSeriously i think this case has a deep impac...PacMan<BR/><BR/>Seriously i think this case has a deep impact and I think this scapegoat should plead not guilty and should appeal if justice is undone.<BR/><BR/>如你所說警方真的以'浪費警力'入罪, 真的非常可怖. 試想想如我的樣衰, 被的進差舘, 盤問數小時, 不得要領, 可告我浪費警力嗎?<BR/><BR/>要知此個案與亂打999 或報假案不同, 警方是要主動在網上'巡纙',才抓到此不幸小兒, 本質上與日常在街上巡纙並無二致. 有證據 charge 則上庭, 冇則放人. 絕不能用'莫順有'的罪名人罪.<BR/><BR/>This guy is already very unfortunate, dont add salt Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6155812.post-61901174000336325242007-06-04T23:11:00.000+08:002007-06-04T23:11:00.000+08:00咁如果請個bar幫佢打三堂你係咪起碼幫佢出一堂律師費先? 話晒你都係戰友貝理雅喎,如果唔係你唔可以怪...咁如果請個bar幫佢打三堂你係咪起碼幫佢出一堂律師費先? 話晒你都係戰友貝理雅喎,如果唔係你唔可以怪佢熬底架~~roflAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com