大家應該記得，喺9月嘅立法會選舉中，公民黨不斷被社民連狙擊。到3個月後嘅今日，都仲有公民黨黨員唔明，點解泛民中人要打佢哋。
公民黨抵打嘅原因，係因為佢哋個個都係政壇丁蟹。即係瘋狂地覺得自己啱晒，事實係點唔重要，人哋同佢話錯咗，或者咁樣搞唔得都冇用。
低碳經濟未必環保
今日講公民黨，係因為佢哋嘅黨魁余若薇，要求政府搞低碳經濟。低碳經濟係乜？就係盡量將我哋排放出嚟嘅二氧化碳，用得有效率。
二氧化碳點嚟？咪就係為運輸燒石油，或為電力燒煤炭時產生。
好，假設特首聽佢哋講搞低碳經濟，搵專家畀建議。大家知唔知到人類係乜嘢嘅群居模式，先至最低碳？就係高密度城市模式。《經濟學人》甚至話大家日日搭嘅升降機，其實係人類歷史中最環保嘅交通工具。
咁落實高密度政策即係要點做？即係俾人起樓時，起高啲囉！咁公民黨點做？咪走去迫政府瘋狂咁大幅減低新建樓宇嘅高度！
大家唔使問啲好多土地儲備嘅地產發展商，究竟公民黨喺環保上想做啲乜，因為佢哋都想知。
政策矛盾唔知想點
好啦，咁孫柏文或社民連呢啲民主派，因為想知公民黨點解可以支持啲咁矛盾嘅政策，就發炮問問。佢哋就會話點解民主派內訌！
最後，我都想講吓合和（054）嘅合和二期計劃。個計劃冇民意支持，係因為以前叫 Mega Tower，呢個名實在太八十年代，香港人唔 buy o架嘞。大佬呀，一開始叫個計劃做 Willow Tree 咪冇事囉。
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Discussing with lawyers about environmental protection, you'll 'wasting gas' (burning gas will produce carbon dioxide hence not environmentally friendly). I have been in this so called environmental engineering industry for 25+ years and still don't know what this is about. To me environmental protection is about mindset and philosophy. We have faked politicians in the government, don't think we have any philosophers in town?
ReplyDelete零 件 走 私 客 的 迷 思
ReplyDelete你地兩條硬膠佬,想極都唔明點解走的客要細細箱搬運,因為你地只係閉門造車,坐係度齋talk
同被人拉無關,而係因為用大箱要用重型機器吊運,走私唔想咁揚,搵部起重機,即係俾多d人知,又可能要搵多個人操作,成本又上升,而且又唔可以在一般碼頭上落貨,搵塊木板快靚正,做運輸都知呢d常識,係你兩條硬膠佬知少少扮代表,係度吹水,實情硬膠膠,仲以為自己好醒
節省一點啦,名嘴!
hahahahha
ReplyDeleteWell said. We did think of that angle...
But would just one need to slide the big box down the wooden plank?
And let gravity do the hard work...
Also to sfong15,
ReplyDeleteIt is mindset/philosophy and implementation.
The UK car driving program Top Gear recently drove a Prius and M3 together... And see which was more fuel efficient.
Prius went flat out and M3 followed at the same speed.
The result? M3 was more fuel efficient.
But what does HK politicians do? blindly say we need to control cars and REDUCE fuel costs. When higher fuel costs are the best way to govern one's driving BEHAVIOUR.
Agree pakman, it's also implementation but if mindset/philosophy is right we could leave the details to the 'wisdom of the crowd' things will be done right in due course.
ReplyDeleteIn philosophy you don't argue details like comparing if Prius or M3 is better for the job or argue about if the bitumen of that highway was favourable to M3 or there was strong headwind which maybe more favourable to Prius with a lower drag coefficient. The focus is wrong.
I see 'AM' labeled car picking up civil servant every morning downstairs, what is wrong with taking MTR to work? I see politicians still demanding piles of paper printed reports while yelling that we tax-payer should be proud of the wonderful e-government ... why. We have politicians who don't 'walk their talks'.
Lawyers and the like should be watching over the government to act as role model, educate the public the right mindset and a philosophy to live a green life....starting from the top, to begin with sell all Audi/BMW .... and ask Universities/industry to produce hybrid for the government.
早排響報紙寫左推咁既野：「在不填海、不威脅郊區生態、不興建屏風樓、不挑戰丁權、不增加交通壓力，和不能與視樓價如命根的中產作對的前提下，如何能同時減低城市密度和增加居住空間，讓不分貧富也能安居樂業，既需要將心比心的人文關懷，也需要通盤分析的制度思考。」
ReplyDelete不過香港原來興玩 piecemeal, 餐餐盡餐餐清，呢Ｄ野都係無人理架喇...