某國家的央行印鈔,印完就畀該國政府用,呢個就叫「量化寬鬆政策」。
以前市場有100件產品、100元流通,每件產品價平均1元。央行印多30元畀政府用,產品數目不變,平均價升至1.3元。你個袋裏面嘅一蚊,已買唔到嘢。呢個就係啲人點解驚「量化政策」,點解要拋售該國貨幣。
歐央行唔會印鈔救市
聯儲局印鈔畀花旗國政府,所以啲人就唔要美元。不過有冇央行唔可以印鈔畀政府用?其實係有。因為呢間央行「冇政府管」,起碼冇單一政府可以指指點點,呢間就係歐洲央行。
講話要印鈔救市,南歐嗰班PIGS(Portugal葡萄牙、Italy意大利、Greece希臘、Spain西班牙)要救嘅迫切性,肯定高過花旗國。
不過歐央行係唔可以印鈔買成員國嘅國債,因為買一個國家嘅債,其他成員國一定要佢買埋其他歐國國債。鐵索連舟,政治成本太高。
只要市場覺得聯儲局會「量化」而歐央行唔會,歐元必贏美元,歐元必繼續升。
孫柏文諗諗吓,發現歐元瓦解嘅路線圖。
今年初唔少人開始問,一旦歐洲全面被海嘯冲擊,歐元會唔會瓦解?如果會,路線圖係點?
要瓦解,先要有國家退出。大家一定以為最想退出係啲想自己印鈔「量化」嘅國家,咁諗就大錯特錯。因為呢啲國家已享受咗太耐歐元嘅低息,一旦退出,新貨幣利息即刻飛升。要退一定係強勢退出。
一印鈔歐元區即散
咁歐元區最會強勢退出嘅肯定係德國。如果歐洲啲弱勢國,成功迫到歐央行印鈔買各弱勢國嘅國債,德國退出指日可待。理由係德國以前試過因通脹令希特拉上台,所以非常恐懼通脹。
如果德國退出,歐元就……
所以大家一定要睇實究竟歐央行有冇印鈔舉動,因為唔似美元,歐央行一印「量化」,歐元就玩完。
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
聽講日本晨早就試過你所謂的量化寬鬆貨幣政策,對嗎?
ReplyDelete咁日本又有無出現超級通脹,日圓又有無大幅貶值呢?
想想看!
分析得好好。
ReplyDelete小弟估德國退出歐羅區嘅機會好微,理由係當初攪歐羅區就係為咗歐盟一體化,同埋歐洲各國間嘅自由貿易。攪得咁辛苦冇理由家下就話要退出卦?
反而美國財長如果今晚公布嘅救毒資產方案獲得市場嘅信心,咁樣美元可能會反高潮升番上嚟都唔定。At least 兌日圓呢 pair 家下已經做番 97。
Cheers!
"咁日本又有無出現超級通脹,日圓又有無大幅貶值呢?"
ReplyDeleteInflation did not occur as the QE was financed by the rich citizens.
Weakened dollars and/or hyperinflation are more likely than not to occur in the States, as the citizens are in poverty, if not bankruptcy. The debtors / government bond holders suffer more anyway.
Hyperinflation, if it occurs, will be a global phenomenon, not a containable problem limited to a few nations.
這麼好的貼,竟然沒有人頂,我來頂一個.
ReplyDelete大家也來幫我頂一下哦.
"erica"?哈哈!
ReplyDelete好似中咗毒或被洗腦一樣,印銀紙就咁咁咁咁咁喎。
依家好似係CREDIT CRUNCH喎!你估係打仗無啦啦咁大量印銀紙呀!
雖然個貨幣基礎係大咗,加埋個乘數效應,理論上會對信貨增長有所幫助,但要回復到制刺激物價上升重有很長很長的路要走。
ReplyDelete再想想!
有咁多時間不如去溝吓黎三萬,你滿臉鬍子可能有SELLING POINT喎!
ReplyDelete想多想!
"咁日本又有無出現超級通脹,日圓又有無大幅貶值呢?"
ReplyDeleteQE is done in Japan by purchase bad assets of banks, which is in effect dress-up of their balance sheet rather than generating goods/services purchase. However, QE in US will give money to gov, which certainly generate production activities.....
Also, the unrealized inflation in Japan is also probably due to the carry-trade of yen, which reduce the effective money supply inside Japan....
So much emphasis on "想!"
ReplyDeleteToo bad I am the scarecrow from the Wizard of Oz.
You use your ass to think, don't you? So being a scarecrow is not a worry!
ReplyDeleteMay I refer to the anon above to this previously stated policy...
ReplyDeletehttp://phatdat.blogspot.com/2007/04/new-policy-on-phatdat.html
Oh! Just Joking....
ReplyDeleteMy apology.
Then... Start kissing where I think.
ReplyDelete