Monday, March 02, 2009

點解要12供5


12股供5股

1手400股

400股便要供166.67股

Round up 嘅話，就係167股。

匯控想同股東講D乜？

唔會強暴D納稅人... 所以每手一碌柒... 自己搞點
Posted by at

21 comments:

  1. 市場維京人Tue Mar 03, 12:20:00 am GMT+8

    要手持 12 手匯控先至冇碎股。呢個數字真係好神奇。

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousTue Mar 03, 12:35:00 am GMT+8

    算術上，3手或其倍數便唔會有碎股。

    有道理，有道理，一碌栥真具有地方智慧的表現。

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousTue Mar 03, 12:38:00 am GMT+8

    對對對，整數為3手，無碎股為12手。

    ReplyDelete
  4. 若缺齋老人Tue Mar 03, 02:07:00 am GMT+8

    有種開大開細既感覺!

    (我買大,去馬!)

    ReplyDelete
  5. HanaTue Mar 03, 09:32:00 am GMT+8

    暈暈哋都俾你講到笑。

    好野！

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousTue Mar 03, 12:28:00 pm GMT+8

    應該如何處理碎股?

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousTue Mar 03, 12:46:00 pm GMT+8

    柏文兄：
    知唔知你個Blog友(Victoria)個Blog咩事？
    個幾禮拜都上唔到去啦！
    快啲幫吓手搞返好佢啦！

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousTue Mar 03, 01:49:00 pm GMT+8

    HSBC股價大瀉, 大家覺得$42是否到底?

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousTue Mar 03, 05:31:00 pm GMT+8

    167點解,可否講白D?

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousTue Mar 03, 07:33:00 pm GMT+8

    自己攪掂... Good! 分析得好好!咁都比你破解到!
    果然係005剋星...

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousTue Mar 03, 09:46:00 pm GMT+8

    供唔供股？供股即要加碼，但你對現有管理層有無信心呢？

    ReplyDelete
  12. pakmanTue Mar 03, 10:17:00 pm GMT+8

    I see the only person who could see pass the veneer of equity analysis...

    to see this blog entry for what it really is... is Hana...

    Which leads me to ask... Do you ALWAYS pose like that in your photos? It's really 80s. ho ho ho

    ReplyDelete
  13. 亞羊Tue Mar 03, 10:47:00 pm GMT+8

    亞羊始終一句,熊市下股票下跌9成.

    四合一價又如何,
    $25??

    ReplyDelete
  14. AnonymousWed Mar 04, 07:14:00 am GMT+8

    仲有pakman點睇隔離袁彌明D期金
    佢張張輸到入肉,又唔平倉
    仲輸到唔俾人o係佢個blog留言...
    有冇笑到訓唔著?

    ReplyDelete
  15. FitchWed Mar 04, 08:26:00 am GMT+8

    To Anon, (Re:Erica)

    I just feel worried for her ...
    it already dropped almost $100 per contract held by her ...

    I did buy more gold last week and stop loss yesterday on this part, cos we need to review our holding time by time ... dun just buy & hold (or sleep =P)...

    same could be applied to HSBC as well ...

    ReplyDelete
  16. pakmanWed Mar 04, 01:06:00 pm GMT+8

    I haven't checked Erica's portfolio...

    But I am sure she set tight stop losses...

    She should be fine.

    ReplyDelete
  17. AnonymousWed Mar 04, 05:16:00 pm GMT+8

    柏文兄：
    點解今日連個Victoria BLOG都無埋？
    咩事呀？

    ReplyDelete
  18. 亞羊Wed Mar 04, 09:45:00 pm GMT+8

    金千其不要買期金,要買實金.

    小心....

    咩... 咩... 咩...

    ReplyDelete
  19. 賭徒Thu Mar 05, 02:42:00 am GMT+8

    hi pakman 兄，

    12供5只有一個非常的專欄題材，希望pakman 兄能夠在報張中踢爆匯豐大班係幾咁仆街。

    一手 400，每手供166.67，供股書寫到明點數位後的0.67無得供，果0.67供股權去左邊？消失左？還是去左包銷商手中？如果左包銷商手中，就變相利益輸送。

    你可話0.67好少o者，無所謂啦，但匯豐有三十萬小股東，如果每個小股東蝕0.67供股權畀包銷商，就合共蝕20萬供股權。

    以今日$44 收市價計，每個供股權值 $16，20萬乘$16 等於三百幾萬，小股東係今次供股行動牌面已經蝕三百幾萬，仲未計有 d 小股東無錢供。

    今次以12供5的做法，擺明搵小股東笨七。點解唔2供一呢？

    ReplyDelete
  20. 賭徒Thu Mar 05, 03:02:00 am GMT+8

    期金的分析：

    我從來都唔信金係避險的。如果係避險，以美金的 scale，只要有幾個 percent 去左買金，期金已經升左好幾倍。無理由升得咁慢及升幅咁細。

    上個月我才想得通點解金會升。

    金的買家從來都係得中國及印度，印度而家仆哂街邊有錢買金，中國經濟同樣唔多好。但係中國一月份貸款有成萬六億，真係貸畀生意佬睇怕1/3都無，大部份囉哂去投機投資，大陸佬咪有錢買金囉。

    當金升到去1000蚊時，班印度不得唔買金，仲要狂沽金，阿爺同時查近有冇人用貸款作為炒賣用途。金的買家減少，咪跌到扒街。

    金長線係會升，但係要等到經濟見底，通漲開始，其他野升哂後。金才會最後升的。

    ReplyDelete
  21. pakmanSat Mar 07, 01:03:00 pm GMT+8

    賭徒兄，

    12供5 ratio is really PK.

    really really PK. Why?

    Why not just 12供6...

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)