我都想炸廸廸尼
舊 年8月26日，22歲男髮型師林嘉樂話自己係「真主教恐怖分子」，走上網上問：「在座有冇人識整炸彈……我想炸廸廸尼……唔該」。跟住就俾人拉咗。當時， 警方話可能觸犯《刑事罪行條例》第54條，企圖導致爆炸意圖危害生命或財產罪，講到有咁大得咁大，講到好似拉咗拉登咁。好勁！
當時，孫柏文都 寫咗篇文，題為「你真係信佢想炸廸廸尼？」，相信毋須要多解釋，大家都知道我嘅論調。不過如果要簡短總結嗰篇文，我當時話差佬喺呢單嘢簡直就係硬膠。我哋 納稅人辛辛苦苦交嘅稅，用嚟去拉呢條友？話呢條友「企圖導致爆炸意圖危害生命或財產」？真係好似俾人抄牌時好多人老土咁講句，捉賊又唔見你咁叻？
不過，可能因為政府知道自己硬膠，呢條友左睇右睇都冇忽似恐怖分子，怕畀外國英文傳媒恥笑，所以就連呢個「經一事、反一智」嘅政府，最後都係要搵個落台階，「只係」告林嘉樂「浪費警力」。
平時，政府揀人拉嘅時候都非常高明，淨係欺善怕惡，專揀啲冇還擊力嘅人。例如，要拉人「不雅」，最好就係拉啲學生，而有明光社呢啲揸正牌支持嘅刊物，就會有特權被豁免。而拉網友嘅時候，就專揀啲「電車男」，因為知道佢哋一定棄甲而逃。
不過，去到今年2月，「真主教恐怖分子」林嘉樂就首次提堂，罕有地唔認罪，要同欺善怕惡嘅政府打官司。當時，我講過，孫柏文全力支持林嘉樂！如果林嘉樂係布殊，你就當孫柏文係貝理雅。
我曾經講過，林嘉樂寫啲咁嘅嘢，只係想運用「諷刺性模仿」parody嘅手法，去紓緩我哋特區人民對世界嘅憂慮。如果林嘉樂有錯，就係錯在搞爛gag唔好笑。如果「搞爛gag唔好笑」都要坐監，孫柏文更加要支持林嘉樂打贏呢場官司，更加要做林嘉樂嘅貝理雅！呵、呵！捍衞搞爛gag自由！
-----------------------------------------------後記：大家睇完之後，係唔係覺得孫柏文好硬膠？林嘉樂到禮拜五開審嘅時候，突然「熬底」，由唔認罪改為認罪 。估唔到我呢個貝理雅，會遇到一個咁樣嘅布殊。嗰種仲以為搵到戰友，繼而被離棄嘅感覺，只能用眼淚表達。
今日6月4日，年輕人為了自由對抗強權的勇氣，去了哪？
咁如果請個bar幫佢打三堂你係咪起碼幫佢出一堂律師費先? 話晒你都係戰友貝理雅喎，如果唔係你唔可以怪佢熬底架~~rofl
ReplyDeletePacMan
ReplyDeleteSeriously i think this case has a deep impact and I think this scapegoat should plead not guilty and should appeal if justice is undone.
如你所說警方真的以'浪費警力'入罪, 真的非常可怖. 試想想如我的樣衰, 被的進差舘, 盤問數小時, 不得要領, 可告我浪費警力嗎?
要知此個案與亂打999 或報假案不同, 警方是要主動在網上'巡纙',才抓到此不幸小兒, 本質上與日常在街上巡纙並無二致. 有證據 charge 則上庭, 冇則放人. 絕不能用'莫順有'的罪名人罪.
This guy is already very unfortunate, dont add salt to his wound.
On the contrary, i believe we have reasonable grounds of complaining Police using unnecessary and excessive force.
Did you have court report or records?
Dear Branco,
ReplyDeleteI don't know what his fiscal profile looks like. But he should apply for legal aid.
Ultimately, the price of barristers is very high. Too high.
I am pissed about that too!
Anyhow, it is extremely intimidating to face the full power of a vengeful government bent on a holy crusade to stamp out "sinful" speech.
I can understand why he plead guilty.
ReplyDeleteI just wish he didn't. I really really did. Hell, if he didn't have any money to fight, I will be the first to seek donation.
Shuen
最認同你呢句：”捉賊又唔見你咁叻？”
ReplyDelete呢單嘢點可以告”浪費警力”？真係要問下法律界人士．
裁判官林嘉欣指九一一事件後，公眾對「炸彈」、「美國領事館」及「恐怖分子」等字眼較敏感，指被告所為對公眾構成恐慌，就如在人多的戲院內大喊「火燭」，毫無幽默感及開玩笑成份。去年九月十九日警方接獲舉報，在迪士尼樂園內大舉搜查及加強保安，共耗用二百一十三小時警力，涉及公帑三萬二千多元。
官方反應過敏啫，佢哋硬膠都入埋當事人數？世上最屈機事件不過如此．
6月4日燭光晚會
ReplyDelete證明大家
對自由仲有希望
咁唔該大家
迪迪尼、超連結呢類硬膠case
定要大大力小下正苦 & 硬膠警察
Will have a new blog entry on this.
ReplyDeleteLet me give it some thought.