Thursday, November 29, 2007

為公義 政府社工減酬!

噚日,應承大家繼續講滙豐將「癌症」SIV注入身體。不過今日想講可以扭轉國運嘅嘢先。話到明癌症,等到下個禮拜都應該未死,到時續談。

噚日,孫柏文經過灣仔,諗住去胡忠大廈,搭巴士去中環。點知,嗰度個巴士站被警方勒令暫停使用,因為附近有大群社工罷工要求同工同酬,搞到我要行多一個站。

應該減半

行過啲示威者時,我真係有啲驚。因為一班覺得孫柏文唱歌,同張學友唱歌應該有「同酬」嘅人,真係唔知佢哋會點做。

當然,我明白點解社工覺得不公平。例如,不排除有張學友fan屎,覺得佢唱歌同孫柏文一樣咁好。不過張學友喺私人市場出唱片,我就係政府請嘅「社會歌手」。張學友出唱片賺嘅錢只得我嘅一半,所以要求「同工同酬」。

講真,如果歌迷覺得張學友唱歌同孫柏文一樣好,就應該立刻要求政府將我嘅薪酬減一半。

因為除非我唔唱轉行,政府將我嘅薪酬減半,我都會繼續做公僕,貢獻社會,因為走出嚟出唱片,薪酬都係咁。

同一邏輯,達到同工同酬目的嘅最好方法,就係將不合理咁高人工嘅政府社工薪酬減半。仲有,慳番嚟嘅錢,就可以做多啲醫療、教育等。為公義政府社工立刻減酬。

早前,法國新總統Sarkozy(薩爾科齊),面對鐵路工人罷工,都冇向呢啲既得利益集團屈服,佢大獲全勝,被譽為80年代「戴卓爾夫人打礦工,扭轉英國國運」式嘅勝利。工人罷工嘅神髓,係要令各界覺得佢哋非常重要。鐵路工人罷工,交通網癱瘓,非常重要,Sarkozy仍勝。社工罷工就…I don't know。

加幾多分?

我哋特區就冇咁好彩,有個競選時大大聲話會打工會,一人一票選出嘅領袖。因為睇吓七.一前,一班班醫生等嘅高薪厚職工人,要求政府合埋眼一刀切加薪。政府嘅答覆?就有如一位老師,被一群學生要求合埋眼一刀切加分時,問啲學生:「加幾多分?」

Sarkozy vs曾蔭權。歷史會覺得邊個係真正嘅政治家?如果有普選,我買曾蔭權。

13 comments:

  1. 其實社工門真的不知所謂, 他們要求"同工同酬"應該找他們各自的老板--各NGO,"一筆過撥款"同他們的人工沒任何關係,只和市場供求有關, NGO的高級社工管理層發現可以用$8000請一個社工,就不會用$12000去請同樣的人, 而各社工的工作表現只和他的個人能力及其管理人員的管理有關.
    雖然蘋果已經淪為"飯聞"及4萬的宣傳工具及打手, 好在仍能容納你這類聲音,否則可讀性比文會都可能不如, 遲早步一本大便後塵.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 忘了提張超"綠"呢條契弟,連政棍都不如,強詞奪理,只顧一己私利,邊到有so就痴埋去....我覺得佢影哀班社工.
    肥文,得閒寫下佢la.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We are very happy for you to go read 膠報... i mean 明報...

    As for 張超雄, he has hi jacked the entire democratic camp for his 既得利益集團. The perils of 功能組別.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 其實第一膠報係你地蘋果,睇睇你地社評永遠係 大陸衰、政府笨、民建聯鈍;英美好、市民唔支持泛民正硬膠等 <= 每朝收音機讀各報社評,聽到蘋果都笑出黎~

    ReplyDelete
  5. 根本呢個世界就無同工同酬呢樣野. 你係蘋果寫專欄, 同係xx日報寫, 都係兩個價錢. 成報的員工, 仲成日被拖欠工資.

    呢班社工, 日日對住佢地幫助的低下階層, 就知道沒有可能同工同酬. 佢係一間工廠大廈做"食蕉"只有4000元人工, 同一個職位, 係中環, 就起碼有8000元或更高.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 其實呢件事證明咗香港經濟真係好咗。
    唔係佢哋點會夠膽出來遊行要求加薪。
    係政府之前加咗人工吡人之後,
    啲阿豬阿狗咪走出來攞著數。

    ReplyDelete
  7. 做乜個個乘機抽萍果水?
    香港地份份報紙都有自己的硬膠立場啦,
    定係你地恨鐵不成鋼?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I really hate to see those BS like "agree with sbd" without any reason.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous Sat Dec 01, 02:40:00 PM HKT, why you hate? what's your reasoning?

    ReplyDelete
  10. umm...

    Why hate simply a person agrees with another.

    If one wants to know the "point" or reason" why person A agrees with person B.

    Isn't as simple as reading what person B wrote in the first place?

    I dun understand too.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hate is an emotion. doesnt really need any reasoning.Like is like, hate is hate. Very simple.

    I like this piece. I hate you. I love sbd. doesnt need to make sense but still fine.

    But if you talk about agreeing something, agreeing with sbd, at least, please show WHY.

    Last, I like this blog. And I hate to see those BS coming up here. Because of your BS, I made 2 BS here to stop your further BS. So now I hate you twice.

    Any sense here? Absolutely not. Because it is only my emotion, thats why it is BS again. Just like yours.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Anonymous Sat Dec 01, 02:40:00 PM HKT" & "Anonymous Sat Dec 01, 10:31:00 PM HKT", Are you two the same guy?

    ReplyDelete