坊間當然傳來好多解釋方法。最精采嘅，就係有人話特首曾蔭權喺前個禮拜五，話空氣質素已見改善，而天神覺得特區高官「篤眼篤鼻」，所以就懲戒佢。情況有少少似《壹週刊》楊懷康社長話齋，喺幾個月前，前特首董建華突然接受訪問為自己平反。點知訪問之後冇幾日，天神就跌架昂坪360纜車落嚟，懲戒吓佢一樣。
污染自華南吹嚟
呢啲咁迷信嘅解釋，孫柏文其實係信嘅，番書仔又點？寧可信其有。不過為求滿足嗰啲吓吓都話需要「科學根據」嘅人，我就做咗啲功課。
其實，如果要知道點解空氣突然變得非常混濁，睇番我哋《蘋果日報》報道就得。引述地球之友環境事務經理朱漢強，佢一矢中的咁話：「香港根本理唔到內地交通同電廠排污問題，佢（曾蔭權）咁講係出口術亂噏！」冇錯，啲污染係從華南地區吹嚟。
去到呢度，孫柏文想問：「陸恭蕙，你喺邊？點解唔講嘢？」
再問：「陸恭蕙，思匯政策研究所，去咗邊？點解唔講嘢？」
我要問呢啲問題嘅原因，係因為思匯早前大大聲話：「香港本身係最大嘅空氣污染源頭！」仲要攞好多分析出嚟。佢哋話一年365日當中，逐日逐日計，香港本身係最大污染源頭嘅日數最多，所以得出佢哋嘅結論。
問題係，如果有200日藍天碧海，不過喺嗰啲日子，香港本身係最大污染源頭，再有165日空氣好似上個禮拜咁混濁，不過從華南地區吹嚟，對陸恭蕙嘅思匯嚟講，「香港本身係最大嘅空氣污染源頭！」所以，思匯根本係完全硬膠！
捉錯用神仲危險
大家都知，特區有鬧之不盡嘅硬膠，所以可能想知點解今日要鬧思匯同陸恭蕙。理由係，佢哋係特強膠，破壞力特強嘅硬膠。因為傳媒二話不說咁接受佢哋嘅結論，政府當時就話會推行一連串針對特區境內「有效」嘅政策。勞民傷財都算，最弊係因為思匯嘅結論，政府對付空氣污染嘅注意力放晒喺特區境內，從華南地區吹嚟嘅污染就被完全忽視。
思匯想環保，不過最終令我哋面對多咗危險污染。仲唔係環保硬膠？
Where art thou Christine? Why the silence Civic Exchange?
如果講到環保,個人認為環保署之前做了一個幾膠的決定:不許香港兩電賣電給內地.
ReplyDelete如果由香港發的話,at least 香港政府可以做到野,又可以賺到錢,加上內地班廠商又有多D電可以用.
五一、十一、香港可以大藍天，其實已經prove 得到一D 野...
Yeah it's pretty bone-headed to say Hong Kong is its own biggest source of pollution when mainland China's polluting almost equal amount (44%?) of days in a year.
ReplyDeleteBut what's wrong with cleaning up the air in Hong Kong, when it's perfectly in a position to do? The reasoning is not convincing as you say. But it doesn't mean you shouldn't do it. Cleaning up China will take a whole different approach.
I'm loath to go back, especially during summer, partly because the air has become so unbreathable.
It may cost quite a bit and it might harm some industries. You sounded like the those advocating against the Kyoto Treaty here. It's gonna cost jobs! It's gonna destroy the economy! The thing is you don't realize a whole host of companies have poped up to serve the new green economy. Change happens.
No No...
ReplyDeleteIf the govt says, "by tackling HK, the pollution problem is tackled"
Then the China problem will be neglected.
Also, the way the pollution in HK will be dealt with is this...
The HK electricity companies will move to natural gas. Which requires HUGE capital investment.
Which is fine... Because the electricity companies profits are paid as a % of investment. So they would welcome HUGE investment.
However, HK ppl will pay higher rates.
Now... if the same amount of excess payment was channeled to China as incentive to reduce emissions, I can guarantee we will see far more reduction in pollution.
九月二十八日香港經濟日報
ReplyDelete香港地球之友環境事務經理朱漢強:
"空氣污染的根源，是老掉牙的：能源政策（電廠發電模式、公眾揮霍的用電形態），交通運輸，城市規劃和粵港跨境污染，這些問題彼此糾纏。"
"記得特首先生在月初出席香港大學論壇時，這樣回應空氣污染的質問：「自從今年7月新一屆政府開始後，我們擁有從未見過這麼好的藍天，你看不見嗎？」...
請別急著邀功。
...七月份看到藍天，很大程度還是「望天打卦」之故。夏季是香港的颱風季節，颱風一來，空氣的流動較慢...容易形成高污染或低能見度的情況。由於今年的回歸月颱風很「識做」，未有來港「贈興」，所以沒有讓能見度變差。"